What the move actually involves
The shape follows our standard method, with the Atlassian-specific reality up front: Atlassian's own Cloud Migration Assistants do the mechanical lifting — projects, spaces, users and their content move with the vendor's tooling, not ours. What the tooling doesn't do is the judgement work, and that's the engagement:
Assess first, fixed price. The estate mapped — sites, apps, users against Cloud plans, integrations, the customisations that won't translate — the technology-move-or-improvement question answered explicitly, and the whole journey priced and sequenced before you commit to anything beyond the assessment itself.
The app question, answered honestly. This is where Cloud migrations are won or lost: not every Server app has a Cloud equivalent, some have better replacements, and some were furniture all along. We audit the estate — which apps earn their place, which map to a Cloud alternative, which retire — and as a Marketplace vendor whose own apps made this exact journey, we know the migration from both sides of it.
The migration, run. Sequencing (who moves when), then trial migrations on refreshable clones of your instance — zero impact on the live system, refreshed as often as needed — so the production cutover is a rehearsed event, not a first attempt. Then the production run with Atlassian's assistants, and verification that what was in scope is now there.
The landing. Cloud's admin model differs from the one your team knows — permissions, admin roles, release cadence. Training, the first-fortnight hypercare, and the configuration that makes Cloud feel like an upgrade rather than a relocation.
Move it as it is — or improve it?
The tooling shapes this choice more than ambition does. Atlassian's migration assistants faithfully move what's there — movers, not transformers, as in truth all good migration tooling is, ours included — so a wholesale restructure during the migration is the one pattern that reliably overwhelms the whole process. The honest options are simpler: tidy in situ — clean up what you sensibly can where it is, then migrate the tidied estate — or migrate as-is and improve on the target, as continuous improvement once you've landed (which is exactly the work PlatformCare exists to carry). And if the real driver is that people are unhappy with how things work today, say so at the assessment: that's a process-improvement question wearing a migration's clothes, and it changes the plan.
One thing to plan for either way: Cloud itself works differently — the interface, the admin model, some of the structure. Even a move-everything-as-it-is lands your users somewhere new, so adoption gets planned, never assumed.
Who this is for
Large Jira shops especially: if your engineers live in Atlassian and your estate is substantial, Cloud is the default answer — the reasoning is laid out in our Data Center end-of-life decision guide, which stays the explainer; this page is the engagement. And afterwards, the estate you've just rationalised is exactly what PlatformCare for Atlassian keeps that way.
Further reading: the Atlassian Cloud Migration FAQ.
Proven, in their words
We've run this exact journey. The Rainforest Alliance moved a mission-critical, 1,000-plus-user Confluence estate — hundreds of gigabytes, used across sixty countries — with minimal downtime and their users trained for UAT along the way. Aurora Commerce made their Server-to-Cloud move with us and told the story themselves. Both are on the site, in the customers' own words.
Fixed price: your estate mapped, the app question answered, and a sequenced plan with real numbers — before you're committed to anything.
Book a 30-min consult
No deck. No sales pitch. Just a useful chat.
Tell us roughly what you’re facing. We’ll come back within one business day with thoughts, references, and a sense of whether we’re a good fit.
- ✓ Free, no obligation
- ✓ Direct line to a senior consultant
- ✓ Honest assessment — we’ll say no if it’s not a fit